Wildlife Scientific Problems There is much scientific evidence documenting the failure of animal-based toxicity tests to accurately predict human reactions to chemicals. Such errors are not surprising, given the many differences that exist between species in terms of their anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, and metabolism.
Magel This is an ethical and moral issue of the first order. If animals are so like us that we can substitute them for testing instead of using humans, then surely those animals have the very attributes ability to suffer physically and psychologically, conscious awareness that mean they deserve to be respected and protected from harm — as we would wish for ourselves.
Introduction Vivisection is a social evil because if it advances human knowledge, it does so at the expense of human character.
George Bernard Shaw It is easy to think that animal experimentation has nothing to do with the average Australian — but it does.
Any person who donates to a medical charity is potentially assisting to fund research involving animals. Therefore it is necessary to have a basic understanding of the issues, the impacts on animals and the alternatives, to allow an informed decision to be made as to whether it is appropriate to financially support what has become a multi-billion dollar industry.
Animal experimentation and the invasive use of animals for teaching, is inherently wrong. The use of animals in research and teaching is more about tradition and history than it is about science.
There is also a significant industry providing support services in relation to animal research, including animal breeding, food supply, cage manufacture, etc.
More than six million animals are used annually in research and teaching in Australia and New Zealand. Australia does not yet publish national animal research and teaching statistics, but most States now gather them and publish them separately.
See the statistics at Humane Research Australia. Research and teaching using animals cover wide areas of activity.
The public perception that animal-based research primarily takes place in the field of medicine is false. Find out more about the types of research involving animals. Animals in teaching The use of animals in teaching at all levels of secondary and tertiary education is still widespread.
The majority of such teaching is not directed towards veterinary practice nor training in clinical procedures in humans. In fact, many students are required to use animals in practical classes, then choose careers in which they will never need to use animals.
Some schools have inappropriate facilities and staffing for animals to be housed on site. Any benefits gained by the use of animals in teaching are often outweighed by its tendency to convey the message to students that animals are merely tools available to satisfy human research and curiosity.
There are sufficient alternative teaching aids available to meet the same or more useful educational objectives as those currently being met with the use of animals. At the tertiary level, Animals Australia considers that the need for animals in teaching cannot be established except in relation to the teaching of veterinary and animal science courses.
Where no non-animal alternatives exist, knowledge and skills should be obtained by study of, and practical work on abattoir materials, models, or through assistance with actual clinical cases.
Independently of the problems of reactionary religious belief, the trend to establish animal testing facilities in countries with weak or no regulations is an extremely worrying one. This objective of this research paper is mainly to better understand the current situation about the issues of animal experimentation from different views. Online articles, journals, encyclopedia and books were used for reference in this research paper. OBJECTIVE. These canons provide standards of ethical conduct for industrial hygienists as they practice their profession and exercise their primary mission, to protect the health and well-being of working people and the public from chemical, microbiological and physical health hazards present at, .
Primate experimentation It would shock caring Australians that every year hundreds of non-human primates are being tested on in Universities and institutions around the country.
However, for all our apparent similarities, the results of animal experiments on non-human primates cannot be directly applied to humans — meaning that, ultimately, hundreds of primates are being killed every year in tests that have viable animal-free alternatives.
There are already many alternatives to animals which have been developed, particularly in the areas of toxicity testing and teaching. Developments have occurred most rapidly and effectively in countries in which the use of animals is prohibited.
The use of alternatives may involve the use of the same experimental goals, but using instead techniques which may include cell cultures or computer programs, or it may involve changing the experimental aim altogether, such as eliminating an animal based experiment and replacing it with a clinical experiment involving humans.Independently of the problems of reactionary religious belief, the trend to establish animal testing facilities in countries with weak or no regulations is an extremely worrying one.
Introduction. In the history of mankind, animal products have been the basis of the diet of people with different ages, health conditions, and secular and religious beliefs. Dream Bible is a free online dream dictionary to help you interpret the meanings to your dreams.
Check out our + word dream dictionary, discussion forums, and dream enhancer information. EDITOR'S NOTE. Behind the lens again, photographer Hudson shoots the team that got the Gulf War babies' story told: left to right, reporter Briggs; senior editor Robert Sullivan, and contributing editor Kenneth Miller, who wrote the piece.
Animal Rights And Animal Welfare - Although farming is usually depicted as wide open fields with animals freely roaming and grazing, the harsh reality of animal treatment is vastly different. Summary: Animal “rights” is of course not the only philosophical basis for extending legal protections to animals.
Another, competing, basis is based on the theory of utilitarianism – the outright rejection of rights for all species and instead advocacy for equal consideration.